To learn more about their perspective, take a look at the presentations: Senior engineering leaders from Microsoft gave talks about the systems problems they’re working on, hoping to give students a sense of the industry challenges and opportunities they’re facing. Student research, delivered as a combination of short talks and poster presentations, made up a significant portion of the summit. ![]() From top left clockwise: Xianjheng Dou, Alex Mariakakis, Peng Huang, Fadel Adib, Vasuki Swamy, Lavanya Jose. Student Talks at the 2016 Microsoft Research Student Summit on Mobility, Systems, and Networking. Bringing together top-notch computer science PhD student researchers who are about to embark on their careers with researchers and engineers who have proven research and technology impact, clearly seemed the right thing to do. Not only does research require constant exposure to new thinking, but researchers themselves thrive when they’re surrounded by fresh ideas and perspectives. The best technologies, which require years of research and development, often start with ideas that were the result of great minds coming together. The motivation for the summit was simple: Give brilliant students and senior Microsoft researchers an opportunity to spark. Fourth- and fifth-year grad students were nominated by their advisors to participate in the event, held in Petaluma, CA. In a two-day summit in February that was as much mind meld as conference, 45 PhD candidates from the top computer science departments in the United States met with a group of Microsoft researchers and engineers for the Student Summit on Mobility, Systems, and Networking. I suppose this only complicates the matter, but I'm not sure what to make of it.Attendees gather at the 2016 Student Summit on Mobility, Systems, and Networking in Petaluma, CAīy Vani Mandava, Senior Program Manager Victor Bahl, Distinguished Scientist and Alec Wolman, Principal Researcher, all from Microsoft Research My question is if the two incidents should be comprable, and to what extent physiology and custom have on such events as sexual or quasi-sexual assault in Starfleet?Įdit: I do recall Tuvok and maybe even Spock using it more as an interrogation technique on unwilling adversaries as well. I recall the Vulcan on VOY who wasn't Tuvok had a more obviously sexual assault on B'lenna at one point during his Ponfar (sp?), seemingly with no consequences. The whole scene to me is intentionally pointing out the violation as akin to a sexual assault. ![]() This dude is even trying to tell Archer that because she was cool with it at first it's a green light the whole time. ![]() She freaks out, and has to fight him off, and when he leaves she is visibly upset and calls sickbay. She gets immediately uncomfortable, then tells the other Vulcan she doesn't like it, then tells him to stop, and he's got this creepy-ass smile and he's saying no and keeps going. It starts with some reluctance, but T'Pol is consenting to the process, until it hits her like a ton of bricks. I'm watching S1E16 "Fusion" of ENT and T'Pol was just talked into doing a mindmeld with a Vulcan who has 'embraced' his emotions and seeks to show her that emotions shouldn't be feared.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |